Sgt. William Alfred Walmsley Gaunt (see
26th February), who had been transferred to the Army Reserve
Class Z in February, was awarded an Army pension of 6s. 6d. per week as a
result of the wounds he had suffered in October 1916.
Pte. James Wilding
Clarkson (see 26th
February), who had been transferred to the Army Reserve Class Z in
February, was involved in a violent property dispute, the events and aftermath of
which were later reported in the local press, as follows:
GRINDLETON - THROWN INTO A DITCH
Lively Doings over a House
The Bolton-by-Bowland magistrates were occupied over two
hours on Monday in hearing charges of assault made by William Altham,
overlooker, East View, Grindleton, against James Wilding Clarkson, weaver,
Cherry Hall, Grindleton and his son Joseph Clarkson.
For the complainant, Mr. Birtwell of Burnley, stated that
early this year Altham purchased the premises occupied by defendant, and it was
agreed that Clarkson should continue to be tenant of the house and that Altham
should have the garden. A good deal of unpleasantness had been created and
Clarkson had challenged Altham to fight on more than one occasion. On September
20th Altham went to collect the rent and it was alleged that the two
Clarksons began to jostle him. He got away and went to the rear of the premises
to measure a window which it was proposed to convert into a door. No sooner had
he begun the work than the elder Clarkson pulled him down and began to beat
him. Ultimately, he got away but the Clarksons followed, threw him into a ditch
and beat him, leaving him unconscious. In the evening Altham was walking up the
village with his wife when the older Clarkson again attacked him. He protected
himself and finally got away. This statement was borne out by complainant.
Mr. T.J. Backhouse, for defendant, said there had been an
arrangement that the two men should change houses. On the day of the alleged
assault Atham declared that he would have to move or he would take out the
windows. He went to the rear with the hammer and chisel and began hammering
around the window. Clarkson went to him, took the implements, and threw them
into the road. Altham then began to throw stones at the windows, four entering
the house and smashing three jugs. Clarkson then went towards him and Altham
threw a stone which struck him in the face. Defendant thereupon attacked Altham
and did undoubtedly give him a ‘good hiding’. Later Altham returned with his
wife and son and the door was struck with a stick, thumped and kicked, Clarkson
wisely remaining indoors. In the evening it was Altham who attacked Clarkson, cutting
him about the face. As a result, defendant had been off work ever since.
Defendants corroborated this account of what transpired and
the elder defendant was fined 40s.; the case against the younger man being
dismissed on payment of costs.
Lancs Evening Post, 21st November
At Clitheroe County Court yesterday, before Judge Sturges,
James Wilding Clarkson, weaver, formerly of Cherry Hall Cottage, Grindleton and
now of Barnoldswick, claimed £47 2s. 6d. damage sustained during an alleged
trespass and assault, from William Altham, East View, Grindleton, owner of the
cottage. Mr. Lustgarten, barrister of Manchester, instructed by Mr. J.T.
Backhouse, appeared for plaintiff, and Mr. J.C. Jackson, barrister of Manchester,
briefed by Mr. J. Birtwell of Burnley, was for the defence.
Clarkson, an ex-soldier, said he had lived in the house in
Grindleton since 1914 and when he returned from the Army in January last
learned that it had been purchased by Altham. On September 20th Altham
called for the rent and began knocking off the plaster round one of the windows
with a hammer and chisel. Clarkson asked him if he was going to have a supply
of water laid on, and his reply was that he had given Clarkson five months to
get out and he was going to pull the windows out. He also declared that he
would do what he liked with his own property. Clarkson, however, took the
hammer and chisel from him and threw them int the road. He then returned to the
house and Altham began to throw stones through the windows, breaking seven panes
of glass, three jugs in the house and damaging a wringing machine. Clarkson
went to the front door which Altham was passing at the time. Altham had a stone
in his hand and threw it at Clarkson, hitting him in the face. “I gave him a
hiding” Clarkson added. His Honour, “What does that mean?”. Clarkson, “I gave
him a fairly good roasting”. Mr. Jackson, “Your Honour will hear that Altham
was a hospital patient afterwards”. His Honour, “As the boys say, did he take
it lying down?”. Mr. Jackson, “He was lying down most of the time with Clarkson
sitting on him”. Continuing, Clarkson said that about an hour later Altham
returned to the house, accompanied by his wife and son. They began kicking and
hammering at the front door. His Honour, “You had not given him enough?”. Clarkson,
“He shouted ‘Come outside now; I am well prepared for you!’, but I did not
accept the challenge”. His Honour, “Where was the local policeman all this
time?”. Clarkson, “Miles away”. Mr. Jackson, “Plaintiff should know, he has
been a policeman”. Clarkson went on to say that at eight o’clock the same
evening he was walking through the village when he encountered Altham and his
wife and the former cut him across the face with a stick, which was broken. He
thought his eye had been bursted and, as a result of the injuries caused, he
was unable to go to his work for over a fortnight. As a result of the incident Clarkson
was summoned at the police court and fined 40s.
Mr. Jackson, “You wanted a garden attached to the house,
telling the defendant you had fought for the land and he was not going to have
it”. Clarkson, “I told him I had fought for the likes of him”. Further
questioned, Clarkson said he went to the village public house after the alleged
assault, but it was for the purpose of having a bath. Mr. Jackson, “Did you
drink four pints of beer?”. Clarkson, “No. I had three pints.” Mr. Jackson, “Was
that the bath?” (laughter).
The defence was that Clarkson was the aggressor. Mrs. Altham
saying that she thought Clarkson was going to kill her husband. His Honour said
Clarkson failed if he did not prove Altham to be the aggressor in the evening.
Counsel addressed the court on this phase of the action.
Summing up, His Honour expressed the opinion that Altham
behaved very unwisely, especially having regard to the disposition of Clarkson,
who was a very strong man and probably likely to back his opinions with
violence. With respect to the alleged assault in the evening, Altham’s
contention was that Clarkson first caught hold of him by the collar. If that
was true, Altham was entitled to use violence in self protection. He was
satisfied that Clarkson had not proved that he did not first seize Altham and
there would be judgement for Altham. In order to mark his disapproval of Altham’s
action in returning to the house in the afternoon and challenging Clarkson, His
Honour refused to allow costs.
Payment of a £5 war gratuity was authorised in respect of
the late 2Lt. Harry Thornton Pickles
(see 26th June 1916).
|
2Lt. Harry Thornton Pickles |
Payment of an £8 war gratuity was authorised in respect of
the late Pte. Richard Davies Ellison
(see 21st October 1916)
who had been killed in action in July 1916; the payment would go to this
mother, Margaret Ann.