Pte. Arthur Hargreaves |
The match was the subject of an extended report in the
following week’s edition of the Folkestone, Hythe, Sandgate and
Cheriton Herald.
MILITARY FOOTBALL
9TH SOUTH STAFFORDSHIRES 1: 10TH WEST
RIDINGS 0
On Saturday afternoon last a football match was played on
the Canterbury Road ground between 9th Battalion South Staffordshire
Regiment and 10th Battalion West Riding Regiment. The former team
won by one goal to nil.
The teams were as follows:
9th South Staffordshire Regiment: Davis, Young
and Ellsmore, Lacock, Harrison and Gibbs, Lt. Sproat, Ramsdale, Hodges, Harris
And J.H. Cox.
10th West Riding Regiment: Layburn, King
and Hargreaves, Lawton, Smith and Nowell, Mills, Clapham,
Flaherty, Jason and Walsh.
Some fine passing was shown by the Staffords, who were
again attired in the colours of the famous Wolverhampton Wanderers, lent to
them by the directors of that club. The ‘Tigers’, as the Staffords are called,
seemed in much better form this week, and played much more systematically. Some
good play was seen on the part of Hodges (centre forward), who showed
throughout great spirit and very cleverly eluded the Yorkshire backs on several
occasions. Ramsdale (inside right) and Harris (inside left) also played finely,
and proved of great help to their centre. They also showed some very tricky
passing, which characterised their game all through. Lt. Sproat played well on
the right wing and did some praiseworthy work, while J.H. Cox on the other wing
was in fine form. The latter was responsible for the only goal of the match,
which he put in very cleverly. The Staffords’ half-line was fairly strong, Lacock
playing a fine game. The backs, Young and Elsmore, put up a vigorous defence,
which was seldom broken. When the opponents’ forwards did get through they
found a difficulty with the goalie, Davis, who proved a faithful custodian, and
stopped all shots with a degree of celerity which won him great praise.
The Yorks’ playing was greatly impeded by the fact that
nearly all the tram wore regimental trousers, some even turning out in puttees.
Still, the West Riding Regiment put up an admirable game. Throughout the first
half they tried hard to score, but the opponents’ backs usually overcame them.
Their forwards too were perhaps not quite as strong as the Staffords, but they
played well. Flaherty (centre) eluded the Tigers more than once, but failed to
get the ball into the net. The wing play of the Yorks was good and capital
shots were put up the field by Walsh and Mills, who were on the extremes of
each wing. Lawton, a half back, played a good game, turning the ball on several
occasions. The defence of the Yorks, generally speaking, was not very strong,
but their goalkeeper, Cpl. Layburn, played an excellent game, stopping the ball
on numberless occasions when it was in very awkward positions. It was probably
through his first rate play that the Tigers did not score more points (sic).
During the first half of the game both teams seemed fairly
equally matched and scrimmages around each other’s posts were not infrequent
occurrences. Although both tried hard to score, no point (sic) was recorded in the first half.
Upon resumption, the Staffords played up, while their
opponents seemed to flag a little. They soon, however, recovered when the ball
was placed in their territory, but it was taken through and a scrimmage ensued
near the Yorks goal, which after a time ended in Cox (outside left) putting in
a clean shot. The Yorks now backed up and tried hard to equalise, but could not
score, although some clever shots were attempted.
A large number of soldiers and civilians watched the game,
and displayed much enthusiasm. The gate money, amounting to a very considerable
sum, was in aid of the Bevan Hospital, Sandgate. Company Sergt-Major Kilbert, South Staffordshire, took a leading
part in organising this successful match.
There may have been
other of Tunstill’s Men among the 10th Battalion team, but this has
not been established for certain. It may well be that the man named in the
newspaper report as ‘Jason’ was actually Frederick
William Jesson. No men with the surname ‘Jason’ have been identified as
serving with 10th Battalion and it may well be that the surname was
simply misheard and mis-reported. It may also be that either or both of ‘Smith’
and ‘Walsh’ may have been Tunstill’s Men of those surnames, but this cannot be
confirmed.
No comments:
Post a Comment