Accidentally killed 1
Died of wounds 6
Wounded 88
Accidentally wounded 10
Accidentally killed 0
Died of wounds 2
Wounded 44
Accidentally wounded 2
Pte. Willie Parkin (see 28th September) was reported by Cpl. John Bargh (see 23rd August) and L.Cpl. William Edmondson Gaunt (see 1st May) as ‘refusing to obey an order’; on the orders of Lt. Col. Bartholomew (see 13th October) he would be ordered to undergo ten days’ Field Punishment No.2.
A working party from ‘C’ Company were assisting 173rd
Tunnelling Company, Royal Engineers, in an area known as the ‘Duck’s Bill’ when
they came under heavy shelling. The incident was described in a letter written
by 2Lt. Christopher Snell (see below)
outlining the circumstances under which Pte. Sydney Wakefield (see
below) would be awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal; “I am the officer
in command of his platoon and, as he will be too shy to tell you why he has
been thus honoured, it has occurred to me that I ought to let you know how well
he behaved on the occasion he won it. The platoon was working on a mine for the
Royal Engineers and his particular job at the time was working a pump which
pumped air into the mine shaft and let the men down below the ground work with
freedom and in decent air. The Germans started shelling the vicinity of the shaft
head and the Royal Engineer officer in charge of the party told the men that
they could stop work and seek safety. The men refused and Wakefield was largely
instrumental in working the pump all the time the Germans were putting 200
shells near to the shaft head. All the time he was in danger. The whole platoon
behaved magnificently but your brother was chosen as the recipient of the DCM.
Personally, I am awfully pleased he got the medal for he is a jolly good
soldier in every way and ever since he joined the Army he has done his best. I
know you will be pleased to hear how well he has done. I only hope he will
bring greater honour to my platoon by getting a VC and a few other things. I
might add, perhaps, that had he not volunteered to go on pumping at the time
the work down below would have had to stop. He was remarkably cool the whole
time”. The official record of the incident stated, “when the enemy opened a
heavy fire on a shaft head, though ordered to move back under cover, he
continued to work the pumps which supplied air to the men in the mine and kept
the mine free of water even after the shaft head had been struck by a shell”.
Two men from the platoon were killed during the shelling.
Both Ptes. Isaac Beardsley and Ellis Gill had been original members of
the Battalion. Pte. Beardsley was a 23 year-old weaver from Golcar and Gill was
a 19 year-old brass moulder from Bradford. The circumstances of Beardsley’s
death were described in a letter to his sister, written by Lt. George Reginald Charles Heale (see 27th August): "You will
have been informed by the War Office of the sad loss you have sustained in the
death of your brother. He died in action
and was killed during an exceptionally heavy shellfire raid, two hundred high
explosive shells having being sent within fifty yards from where he and others
were working. The Royal Engineers
Officer who was there spoke in the highest terms of the conduct of the men
during that terrible ordeal and your brother was killed when on his way to
stand to arms to repel an expected attack.
I have always considered him the best man in the platoon and it was
always a matter of regret that he would not accept promotion. He was an exemplary soldier and by his good
conduct and constant cheerfulness he earned the goodwill and respect of all the
Officers, N.C.O's and men of the Company.
His loss is a great blow to me, his death must have been absolutely
instantaneous and it must be a comfort to you to know that he suffered no pain. Please accept my sincere sympathy and
consolation in your terrible loss”. Isaac Beardsley now has no known grave and
is commemorated on the Ploegsteert Memorial. Lt. Heale also wrote to the
parents of Pte. Ellis Gill; “I very much regret to inform you that your son,
Ellis, was killed in action yesterday.
He was with a party that came under very heavy shell fire, 200 high explosive
shells being fired within 50 yards of where they were working. He was killed
instantaneously and his face was perfectly calm and had a happy expression when
we found him. He had been in my platoon ever since he joined us, and I always
found him cheerful and willing. I never had occasion to find fault with him and
I liked him very much. He also earned the good opinion of all the men in the
platoon and the NCOs of the Company. His personal effects, including a parcel
that has just come, will be sent through the official channels. I enclose a
letter he had written to his aunt. They have had rather a rough time lately, or
rather they did two weeks ago, but it has been made as easy for them as conditions
would permit. Through it all, whether rough or easy, I have never seen him with
a gloomy expression. He was always cheerful and I shall miss him very much. In
conclusion, allow me to express my sincerest sympathy for you and all his
family, as I can understand how fond you all must have been of him”. Pte. Gill would be buried at Rue-du-Bacquerot
No.1 Military Cemetery, near Laventie.
2Lt. Christopher
Snell was born 1st February 1895, the second son of Rev. Bernard
Joseph Snell and his wife Kate. Rev. Snell was a prominent Methodist minister
and author of several books on religion; in August 1914 he had preached a
sermon at Brixton Congregational Church, outlining the origins of the war and
the text of the sermon had subsequently been published as, ‘Plain Words about
the War’. Christopher himself had been educated at Mill Hill School from 1906
to 1912 and had been an undergraduate at Wadham College, Oxford on the outbreak
of war. He had enlisted in 13th Battalion, London Regiment on 2nd
September 1914 and had been discharged to his commission with 10DWR on 2nd
December 1914.
2Lt. Christopher Snell |
Pte. (Frank) Sydney Wakefield had been an original member of the Battalion. He was originally from Wiltshire but had moved, with his family, to Haworth and had latterly been living in Keighley with his aunt and her husband. He was 20 years old and had worked as a worsted spinner.
Pte. Sydney Wakefield Image by kind permission of Andy Wade and MenofWorth |
J.B. Priestley again wrote to his family, reassuring them that his discontent expressed in a previous letter (see 18th October) was not, for him at least, a permanent state of mind: “You have taken my last letter too seriously; I was out of sorts and indulging in the ‘luxury of a grouse’. You must remember that this is supposed to the privilege of the British soldier. This endless trench fighting and trench making is very wearisome – we should very much prefer to jump over the parapet and drive the cowards out with the bayonet. … What I was grumbling about last letter was the extra-super-officiousness of most of the officers. I’m not grumbling about the ordinary work of the soldier out here. I take that as it comes, naturally. But when it comes to flagrant acts of injustice, my blood boils!”.
Ernest Jobling (standing), with his younger brother, Joseph, who served in the Royal Navy |
The Halifax Courier published a report on a letter
written by L.Cpl. Herbert Bowker (see 10th September);
“In a letter home (Bowker) says that his impression of war after a lengthy
experience at the front, part of which has been gained in the thick of battle,
is that it is a terrible thing, though he has no occasion to grumble, as they
could not be more comfortable under the circumstances that prevail; in fact it
is splendid the way they are looked after. Then there is plenty of adventure,
a love for which flows in the blood of every Englishman, and is especially a
characteristic of the men in khaki”.
Pte. Willie Marsden (see 4th October)
was admitted to 1st Field Ambulance, suffering from eczema; he would
be transferred to 23rd Division Rest Station the following day and
would be treated there until being discharged to duty on 27th
October.
Ptes. William Henry Dobson (see 18th
October), Bob Maunders (see 18th October) and Henry
Wood Thrippleton (see 17th October), who had been at 70th
Field Ambulance at Erquinghem having been wounded over the previous days, were
transferred to 3rd Casualty Clearing Station at Bailleul. All three
would, next day, be evacuated onboard no.16 Ambulance Train to Boulogne, but
the details of their further treatment are unclear. Pte. Dobson seems to have
remained in France and would re-join the Battalion. The wound suffered by Pte.
Maunders was not considered severe and Tunstill himself would subsequently write
to Maunders’ family, reassuring them that their son was being treated at the Australian
Voluntary Hospital at Wimereux, where he was, ‘going on nicely’. From here it
becomes difficult to be sure about the nature of Bob’s treatment, recovery and
return to the Battalion. It is not clear whether he was evacuated to England or
was treated exclusively in France. However at some point he did return to the
Battalion. He was promoted Sergeant and was subsequently wounded for a second
time. The date of this second incident has not yet been established but it
seems that this certainly was sufficient to have Bob invalided back to England.
Pte. Thrippleton would remain in France and would spend some time (details unknown)
at a Convalescent Depot at Boulogne before re-joining the Battalion.
Pte. Fred Job (see 17th October),
who had been wounded the previous day, died at 6.30am of his wounds at 70th
Field Ambulance at Erquinghem; he would be buried at Erqinghem-Lys Churchyard
Extension Cemetery. His sister, Mrs. Crowther, would subsequently receive two
letters concerning the death and burial of her brother. Lt. Adolph Keith Lavarack (see
27th August 1915) would write, “It is with deep regret
that I write these few lines to tell you that Pte. F. Job was wounded yesterday
and passed away this morning. I knew him very well and he was one of the best
chaps in the platoon, always doing his work cheerfully and willingly. It was
only yesterday that I was talking to him and asking him how the wound on his
face was going on, which he received, as you probably know, a few days ago. I
can only end by saying I always had the greatest admiration for him and I
deeply sympathise with those to whom his death will mean so much grief”. The
Battalion Chaplain, Rev. Wilfred Leveson
Henderson (see 16th
September) would write, “I know that you have already heard the sad news of
the death of your brother, but I felt that I would like to drop you a line to
say how deeply I sympathise with you. There was little hope for him from the
beginning, as it was an abdominal wound. I think of all wounds they are the
most serious. He was a fine fellow and will be much missed by his comrades,
with whom he was always popular. We buried him early on Monday morning. I
thanked God for the example of his life and prayed that he might find eternal rest
and peace. I think I may tell you that he lies in the parish church yard in ____________
, side by side with many other brave soldiers. I will see that a cross is
erected to mark his grave. Both officers and men join with me in expressing
their deepest sympathy. May God comfort and strengthen you”.
The fine weather of the previous few days continued, but
with the nights and early mornings noticeably colder and with further foggy
periods around dawn. Routine patrols were sent out and conditions were
generally quiet, though two men were reported wounded by rifle fire. The men
wounded were Ptes. Fred Job and Henry Wood Thrippleton, both of whom
were original members of the Battalion. Pte. Job was 29 years old and from Brighouse and had worked as a
mechanical engineer in Bradford; he suffered abdominal wounds. Pte. Thrippleton
was a 32 year-old labourer from Brighouse; he had suffered wounds to his right
leg. Both men would be evacuated to 70th Field Ambulance at Erquinghem.
Sgt. Henry Herbert Calvert (see 15th September) wrote home with reflections on his recent experiences:
“We arrived here August 27 and have had a strenuous time as most units of this vast army. We have been in bombardment as heavy as any that has taken place, and I don’t think any regular line battalion behaved better under fire and under the muddy conditions of September 25. Few will forget it. We had 12 days straight off, some more, so we did very well for novices. We had few casualties – about 6 killed and 16 wounded. Lost no officers; we are proud of those we have. Have had 7 days’s rest and are back in the trenches but another part. Weather is much the same here as in England, damp and foggy mornings. We get up about 4 in the trenches so there will be no surprise from the enemy. I must mention the sleeping accommodation; great wooden ‘feathers’, a great coat, nothing to make you not want want to get up and any amount of company, ie mice and rats. I think we shall train a few of them to do odd jobs here; they can eat the food alright and can run all over you during the night. Never mind, you get used to anything, and I shall not be particular whose doorstep is the softest, as long as it has a corner for my back. It would do some of those young men good to screw courage up to come out to us. Why prefer to hang about Commercial Street and the Palace?”.
Capt. Adrian O'Donnell Pereira |